Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Adam Cheney's avatar

Interesting perspective and thoughts. I genuinely can argue for both sides on this one. On one hand, hospitality is a good thing--a sacred duty even. On the other hand, the idea of sacred, thin-spaces is legitimate. This goes with the question of whether the Vatican should have a place for Muslims to pray as well. On one hand, it might give true believers a place to worship God without separating themselves from their families. On the other hand, it is a place of worshiping the Triune God. But if God dwells in mankind, not in the structure of a temple anymore then does the structure matter? Thanks for bringing this question up. If I was leading it, I might offer a meal, after the prayers. A space of welcome, but not necessarily a space of Islamic prayer. This reminds me of a mosque/catherdral/temple in Cordoba, Spain. Have you seen it? It is an amazing place to visit that challenges our perspectives... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosque%E2%80%93Cathedral_of_C%C3%B3rdoba

Penny Newson's avatar

Wow this is really shocking to me- probably some of it from having spent the majority of my Christian life in an Anglican setting where I very much feel the building and land has been consecrated. I was on the PCC and we were requested to place something in the car park that was contrary to God’s teaching. We did not give permission and faced some hostility due to the local power of the individuals who had made this request. Maybe not quite the same but to me comes down to showing honour and integrity to God. It is one thing to provide a space for people to meet to eat and another altogether to worship a God who is not ours .

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?